The number of star trackers a satellite requires hinges on several factors, including mission demands, redundancy needs, and technical constraints. A star tracker, essentially a high-precision camera equipped with advanced image-processing capabilities, actively captures images of visible star fields. It then compares these patterns to a preloaded star catalog, calculating the satellite’s three-axis attitude with pinpoint accuracy.
Satellites operate in harsh, unforgiving environments where even slight misalignments can lead to mission failure. Forces like gravitational pull, solar radiation pressure, or internal mechanical issues can cause satellites to drift. Star trackers seamlessly integrate with other systems, such as inertial measurement units (IMUs) or reaction wheels, to form a robust Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS).

Mission Type and Orbit: Satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), such as those in internet constellations, encounter frequent eclipses and atmospheric interference. Consequently, they often need multiple trackers to ensure continuous coverage. In contrast, Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) satellites, which remain fixed relative to Earth, typically require fewer trackers due to their stable environment. Meanwhile, deep-space probes often employ multiple trackers to achieve redundancy over vast distances.
Accuracy and Precision Requirements: High-stakes missions, like scientific telescopes or military reconnaissance, demand sub-arcsecond precision. To meet this, engineers may install two or more trackers to cross-validate data and mitigate errors from sensor noise or stray light.
Redundancy and Reliability: Space is unpredictable—cosmic rays, micrometeoroids, or software glitches can disable a tracker. To counter this, engineers often incorporate redundancy: one primary tracker supplemented by one or two backups. For critical missions, a “hot spare” configuration enables seamless switching.
Field of View (FOV) and Coverage: A single tracker’s FOV can be obstructed by satellite structures, solar panels, or payloads. To address this, engineers strategically place multiple trackers at different angles (e.g., orthogonally) to provide 360° coverage, ensuring stars remain visible regardless of the satellite’s orientation.
Size, Weight, Power, and Cost: Small satellites, like CubeSats or nanosatellites, prioritize miniaturization and often rely on a single compact tracker to minimize mass and power consumption. Larger platforms can accommodate multiple units, but budget constraints limit extravagance—each tracker increases launch costs.
Dynamic Conditions: Agile satellites, which perform rapid maneuvers or track moving targets, benefit from additional trackers to handle high tumble rates or temporary blind spots.
Integration with Other Sensors: In hybrid systems, star trackers complement gyroscopes or magnetometers. If these backup systems are robust, fewer trackers may suffice.
Based on industry practices and real-world deployments, most satellites use one to three star trackers.
– Single Star Tracker Setup: This configuration suits cost-sensitive or low-complexity missions, such as student-built CubeSats. If the FOV remains unobstructed and redundancy isn’t a priority, a single tracker provides adequate attitude data. However, it carries a single-point failure risk, so engineers typically pair it with secondary sensors.
– Dual Star Tracker Configuration: This setup is ideal for many modern satellites. Two trackers offer redundancy and enhanced coverage—one serves as a backup while the other operates primarily. Additionally, this configuration boosts accuracy through data fusion, where algorithms average readings to reduce errors.
– Three or More Trackers: Reserved for high-reliability missions, three trackers enable a “voting” mechanism, where the system discards anomalous data from a faulty unit. Some advanced designs even incorporate up to four trackers for ultra-precise applications, such as interplanetary probes.
Send us a message,we will answer your email shortly!